Markets Slide as Global Headwinds and Foreign Fund Outflows Rattle Investors Neena Shukla Thu, 18 Dec 2025 - 15:23

Renny Strips Initiates IPO to Raise Rs. 300 Crore for Expansion Vinod Pathak Thu, 18 Dec 2025 - 15:23

TCS Strengthens European Presence with Strategic Expansion in Romania Gurminder Mangat Thu, 18 Dec 2025 - 15:23

Cognizant Strengthens Cybersecurity Capabilities with New Defence Centre in Bengaluru Anant Kumar Thu, 18 Dec 2025 - 15:23

Maruti Suzuki Accelerates EV Push with Plan to Localise Key Components in India Amrita Bhatia Thu, 18 Dec 2025 - 15:23

Indian Investors Look Overseas as Global Diversification Gains Momentum Agamveer Singh Thu, 18 Dec 2025 - 13:51

Bitcoin briefly climbed past a key psychological threshold before reversing course, sliding toward its weakest levels of the year as market confidence faltered. The cryptocurrency moved above Rs. 71 lakh, raising hopes of a sustained recovery, but the rally quickly lost momentum amid profit-taking and thinning liquidity. The pullback reflects a broader shift toward risk aversion, driven by macroeconomic uncertainty and cautious investor positioning. While long-term adoption narratives remain intact, short-term price action suggests the market is struggling to attract fresh capital, leaving Bitcoin vulnerable to further volatility in the near term.

A Rally That Failed to Gain Traction

Bitcoin’s move above Rs. 71 lakh was initially interpreted as a breakout, but the advance proved short-lived. Selling pressure emerged almost immediately, erasing gains and pushing prices lower. Traders noted that the move lacked strong follow-through, a sign that buyers were unwilling to commit significant capital at higher levels.

In technical terms, the failure to hold above resistance reinforced concerns that recent rallies are corrective rather than the start of a new uptrend.

Liquidity Constraints and Profit-Taking

Market participants pointed to liquidity dynamics as a key driver of the decline. As prices rose, trading volumes failed to expand meaningfully, leaving the market exposed to sharp reversals. Once selling began, short-term traders moved quickly to lock in profits.

This behavior underscores a market dominated by tactical positioning. Rather than long-term accumulation, many participants appear focused on short-term price movements, amplifying volatility during periods of uncertainty.

Macro Uncertainty Weighs on Sentiment

Bitcoin’s weakness mirrors broader caution across global financial markets. Expectations of tighter monetary conditions and persistent inflation pressures have reduced appetite for speculative assets. In such environments, cryptocurrencies often struggle to sustain upward momentum.

Institutional investors, in particular, continue to treat Bitcoin as a high-risk asset, adjusting exposure in response to macro signals rather than long-term narratives.

Technical Indicators Signal Fragility

From a charting perspective, Bitcoin remains under pressure. Repeated failures near recent highs have strengthened resistance levels, while support near annual lows is being tested. Analysts warn that a decisive break below these levels could invite additional selling.

Stabilization would likely require a combination of improved liquidity, renewed spot demand, and a shift in broader risk sentiment.

Long-Term Optimism Meets Short-Term Reality

Despite the downturn, long-term proponents argue that Bitcoin’s fixed supply and growing integration into financial systems support its long-term value. However, history shows that even strong structural narratives do not prevent significant drawdowns during adverse market conditions.

For investors, the current environment highlights the importance of aligning expectations with time horizon and risk tolerance.

A Market Searching for Direction

Bitcoin’s slide after crossing Rs. 71 lakh reflects a market caught between optimism and caution. Bulls emphasize adoption and scarcity, while bears point to liquidity stress and macro headwinds.

Until one side gains decisive control, price action is likely to remain volatile. For now, the drift toward yearly lows serves as a reminder that Bitcoin’s path forward remains uneven, shaped as much by global financial conditions as by its underlying technology.

A respected market analyst has issued a stark warning about Bitcoin’s long-term trajectory, cautioning that the world’s largest cryptocurrency could suffer an 80 percent decline if structural weaknesses resurface. The warning comes amid renewed optimism in digital asset markets, where rising prices and institutional interest have revived bullish sentiment. The analyst argues that beneath the surface, Bitcoin remains vulnerable to liquidity shocks, speculative excess, and shifts in global monetary conditions. While supporters view Bitcoin as digital gold, critics contend its valuation rests on fragile assumptions that could unravel quickly under stress.

A Contrarian View in a Bullish Environment

As Bitcoin trades near multi-month highs, confidence among investors has strengthened. Yet seasoned observers note that periods of exuberance often precede sharp corrections. The analyst’s warning challenges prevailing optimism, emphasizing that historical performance shows Bitcoin is no stranger to deep drawdowns.

Previous market cycles have seen Bitcoin lose more than 70 percent of its value after peak enthusiasm faded. According to this view, a similar pattern could repeat if macroeconomic conditions tighten or speculative demand dries up.

Structural Risks Beneath the Price Action

The warning centers on what the analyst describes as structural fragility. Bitcoin’s market depth, while improved, remains sensitive to sudden changes in liquidity. A concentration of holdings among large investors can amplify downside moves if selling accelerates.

In addition, Bitcoin’s reliance on continuous inflows of capital leaves it exposed during periods of risk aversion. Unlike traditional assets that generate cash flow, Bitcoin’s valuation depends largely on collective belief and network participation.

Macro Forces Could Trigger a Sharp Reversal

Global financial conditions play a decisive role in Bitcoin’s performance. Higher interest rates, reduced central bank liquidity, or a stronger currency environment can drain speculative capital from digital assets. The analyst argues that if monetary policy remains restrictive, Bitcoin could face sustained pressure.

From a portfolio perspective, Bitcoin often behaves like a high-risk asset during market stress, undermining its narrative as a reliable hedge.

The Bull Case Still Has Defenders

Supporters counter that Bitcoin’s fixed supply, growing institutional adoption, and expanding infrastructure reduce the likelihood of an extreme collapse. They argue that each market cycle has strengthened the network and broadened its investor base.

However, even bullish analysts concede that volatility is inherent to the asset class and that steep corrections remain a defining feature of Bitcoin’s history.

Risk Management Takes Center Stage

For investors, the warning underscores the importance of disciplined risk management. Exposure sizing, diversification, and realistic expectations are critical when dealing with assets prone to large price swings.

Financial advisers increasingly stress that Bitcoin should be treated as a speculative allocation rather than a core holding, particularly for retail investors with limited risk tolerance.

A Market at a Crossroads

The prospect of an 80 percent decline may sound extreme, but history suggests it cannot be dismissed outright. Bitcoin stands at a crossroads between maturation and repetition of past cycles.

Whether the analyst’s forecast proves accurate or overly pessimistic will depend on liquidity conditions, macroeconomic trends, and investor behavior. What remains certain is that Bitcoin’s path forward will continue to test conviction on both sides of the market.

Dogecoin and other memecoins declined alongside Bitcoin as traders reduced exposure to high-volatility assets amid a broader cooling in risk sentiment. The sell-off reflects a familiar pattern in digital asset markets: when uncertainty rises, speculative tokens tend to underperform established cryptocurrencies. Market participants cited profit-taking, thinning liquidity, and caution ahead of macroeconomic signals as key drivers of the retreat. While the moves were not disorderly, they underscored the fragility of memecoin rallies, which rely heavily on momentum and sentiment rather than fundamentals. The episode highlights a renewed focus on capital preservation across the crypto complex.

Bitcoin Sets the Tone for the Market

Bitcoin’s modest retreat set the direction for the wider digital asset market, reinforcing its role as the sector’s primary liquidity anchor. When Bitcoin pauses or corrects, correlated assets often follow, particularly those with higher beta.

Traders described the move as a recalibration rather than a breakdown. Still, even shallow pullbacks in Bitcoin can prompt outsized reactions in smaller, more speculative tokens as leverage is unwound and short-term positions are trimmed.

Memecoins Bear the Brunt of Risk Reduction

Dogecoin, long viewed as a barometer of retail speculation, slipped in tandem with a broader basket of memecoins. These assets typically thrive during periods of abundant liquidity and optimistic sentiment, but struggle when markets turn defensive.

Unlike utility-focused tokens, memecoins lack intrinsic cash flows or protocol-driven demand. As a result, price action is highly sensitive to shifts in trader psychology, making them among the first casualties when risk appetite fades.

Profit-Taking and Liquidity Dynamics

Market participants pointed to profit-taking after recent gains as a key factor behind the decline. As prices stalled, short-term traders moved to lock in returns, increasing sell-side pressure.

Liquidity conditions also played a role. Memecoins tend to have thinner order books than major cryptocurrencies, amplifying price swings when volume drops. Even moderate selling can translate into sharp percentage moves.

Broader Market Caution Emerges

The pullback coincided with a more cautious tone across risk assets. Investors are increasingly sensitive to macroeconomic signals, including interest rate expectations and currency movements, which influence capital flows into speculative markets.

In this environment, traders appear more selective, favoring assets with deeper liquidity and clearer long-term narratives. This shift places additional pressure on tokens driven primarily by social momentum.

Long-Term Outlook Remains Unsettled

Despite the decline, supporters argue that Dogecoin and similar assets continue to benefit from strong community engagement and periodic bursts of speculative interest. History shows that memecoins can rebound sharply when sentiment turns.

However, analysts caution that such recoveries are unpredictable and often short-lived. Sustainable performance remains closely tied to broader market conditions rather than token-specific developments.

A Reminder of Crypto’s Risk Hierarchy

The latest slide serves as a reminder of the risk hierarchy within digital assets. When confidence weakens, capital gravitates toward perceived safety, leaving speculative corners exposed.

For investors, the episode reinforces the importance of understanding volatility dynamics and positioning accordingly. In crypto markets, sentiment can shift quickly—and memecoins are often the first to reflect that change.

Bitcoin markets are entering a critical phase as liquidity dynamics intensify around key price levels, reinforcing the bullish argument for a decisive upward move. Traders and institutional participants are closely watching order flows, leverage positioning, and spot demand as the asset consolidates below major resistance. Supporters of the bull case argue that improving market structure and thinning sell-side liquidity could open a clear path toward the psychologically significant Rs. 79 lakh level. At the same time, short-term volatility reflects an ongoing struggle between profit-taking and fresh capital inflows, highlighting a market that is increasingly driven by liquidity mechanics rather than sentiment alon.

Liquidity Becomes the Market’s Battleground

Bitcoin’s current price action is less about narrative and more about liquidity positioning. Large buy and sell orders are clustering around well-defined levels, creating zones where price movement accelerates once liquidity is absorbed. Market data indicates that sell-side pressure above recent highs is diminishing, a condition that often precedes sharp directional moves.

In professional trading circles, this environment is described as a liquidity squeeze—where limited resistance allows price to move rapidly once momentum builds.

The Bullish Case Gains Structural Support

Proponents of a higher Bitcoin valuation point to improving market structure. Spot demand has remained resilient during pullbacks, suggesting accumulation rather than distribution. Long-term holders appear reluctant to sell, tightening available supply and reinforcing upward pressure.

Analysts note that if Bitcoin clears intermediate resistance levels, the path toward Rs. 79 lakh becomes increasingly unobstructed. In such scenarios, price discovery tends to accelerate as sidelined capital is forced to re-enter the market.

Derivatives and Leverage Shape Short-Term Moves

Futures and options markets are playing a central role in near-term volatility. Elevated open interest signals strong trader engagement, while periodic liquidations on both sides reveal aggressive positioning. When leveraged short positions are unwound, they often add fuel to upward price moves through forced buying.

However, excessive leverage also raises the risk of abrupt corrections, making liquidity management a defining factor for short-term traders.

Institutional Behavior Signals Confidence

Institutional participation continues to lend credibility to the bullish outlook. Larger players tend to focus on liquidity depth and execution efficiency rather than short-term price swings. Their sustained presence suggests confidence in Bitcoin’s medium-term trajectory, even amid volatility.

From a capital markets perspective, Bitcoin is increasingly behaving like a macro-sensitive asset, influenced by broader risk appetite and liquidity conditions rather than retail speculation alone.

Risks That Could Disrupt the Rally

Despite constructive signals, the market remains vulnerable to sudden shifts. A resurgence of sell-side liquidity, macroeconomic shocks, or regulatory headlines could reintroduce resistance and stall momentum. Profit-taking near key psychological levels also remains a near-term risk.

Experienced investors caution that while the trend appears favorable, disciplined risk management remains essential in a market defined by rapid repricing.

A vital phase for Bitcoin

Bitcoin’s current consolidation reflects a deeper struggle over liquidity rather than direction. If buyers continue to absorb available supply, the bull case pointing toward Rs. 79 lakh gains credibility. Failure to do so could prolong range-bound trading.

For now, the balance of evidence suggests a market preparing for resolution. Whether that resolution arrives through a breakout or another test of support will depend on which side controls liquidity in the days ahead.

A private investment firm has outlined its rationale for positioning XRP as its leading cryptocurrency holding, citing liquidity efficiency, real-world payment use cases, and regulatory clarity as decisive factors. While much of the digital asset market remains driven by speculative narratives, the firm argues that XRP offers a differentiated value proposition rooted in cross-border settlement and enterprise adoption. The strategy reflects a broader shift among sophisticated investors toward assets with measurable utility and scalable infrastructure. As institutional scrutiny of crypto portfolios intensifies, XRP’s role as a payments-focused asset is gaining renewed attention within professional investment circles.

A Strategic Departure From Speculation

The firm’s decision to prioritize XRP represents a calculated move away from purely momentum-driven investments. Executives describe their approach as infrastructure-first, favoring digital assets that solve identifiable problems within the global financial system.

XRP’s design, optimized for fast and low-cost value transfer, aligns with this philosophy. Unlike assets that rely heavily on store-of-value narratives, XRP is positioned as a transactional tool, making it easier to evaluate through traditional business and efficiency metrics.

Liquidity and Settlement Efficiency at the Core

Liquidity has been central to the firm’s thesis. XRP’s ability to facilitate near-instant settlement with minimal transaction costs is viewed as a structural advantage, particularly in cross-border payments where legacy systems remain slow and capital-intensive.

From an investment perspective, efficient liquidity reduces friction and enhances scalability. The firm argues that as global payment flows increasingly move toward real-time settlement, assets engineered for speed and reliability stand to benefit disproportionately.

Regulatory Clarity Strengthens the Case

Regulatory risk remains one of the most significant variables in digital asset valuation. The investment firm highlighted XRP’s improving regulatory visibility as a key differentiator compared with other cryptocurrencies facing unresolved legal or compliance challenges.

Greater clarity allows institutional investors to model risk more accurately and allocate capital with higher conviction. In markets where uncertainty often suppresses valuation multiples, regulatory progress can act as a catalyst for reassessment.

Institutional Adoption and Network Effects

Another pillar of the firm’s strategy is XRP’s growing integration into enterprise-level payment solutions. Partnerships with financial institutions and payment providers enhance network effects, increasing the token’s utility as adoption expands.

This institutional alignment contrasts with retail-driven ecosystems that rely heavily on sentiment. The firm views enterprise usage as a stabilizing force, capable of supporting long-term demand even during periods of broader market volatility.

Portfolio Construction and Risk Management

Positioning XRP as a core holding also reflects a broader portfolio construction strategy. By emphasizing assets with functional utility, the firm aims to reduce exposure to extreme volatility while maintaining upside potential.

In this framework, XRP is treated less like a speculative trade and more like a digital infrastructure asset—one whose value is linked to transaction volume and system adoption rather than short-term market cycles.

A Measured Bet on Utility-Led Growth

The firm’s endorsement of XRP underscores a shifting mindset among professional investors. As the digital asset market matures, differentiation based on real-world application is becoming increasingly important.

While risks remain, the firm believes XRP’s focus on payments, liquidity efficiency, and regulatory engagement offers a clearer path to sustainable value creation. For investors seeking exposure beyond speculation, the strategy signals growing confidence in utility-led crypto investments.

A respected market analyst has issued a stark warning about Bitcoin’s long-term trajectory, cautioning that the world’s largest cryptocurrency could suffer an 80 percent decline if structural weaknesses resurface. The warning comes amid renewed optimism in digital asset markets, where rising prices and institutional interest have revived bullish sentiment. The analyst argues that beneath the surface, Bitcoin remains vulnerable to liquidity shocks, speculative excess, and shifts in global monetary conditions. While supporters view Bitcoin as digital gold, critics contend its valuation rests on fragile assumptions that could unravel quickly under stress.

A Contrarian View in a Bullish Environment

As Bitcoin trades near multi-month highs, confidence among investors has strengthened. Yet seasoned observers note that periods of exuberance often precede sharp corrections. The analyst’s warning challenges prevailing optimism, emphasizing that historical performance shows Bitcoin is no stranger to deep drawdowns.

Previous market cycles have seen Bitcoin lose more than 70 percent of its value after peak enthusiasm faded. According to this view, a similar pattern could repeat if macroeconomic conditions tighten or speculative demand dries up.

Structural Risks Beneath the Price Action

The warning centers on what the analyst describes as structural fragility. Bitcoin’s market depth, while improved, remains sensitive to sudden changes in liquidity. A concentration of holdings among large investors can amplify downside moves if selling accelerates.

In addition, Bitcoin’s reliance on continuous inflows of capital leaves it exposed during periods of risk aversion. Unlike traditional assets that generate cash flow, Bitcoin’s valuation depends largely on collective belief and network participation.

Macro Forces Could Trigger a Sharp Reversal

Global financial conditions play a decisive role in Bitcoin’s performance. Higher interest rates, reduced central bank liquidity, or a stronger currency environment can drain speculative capital from digital assets. The analyst argues that if monetary policy remains restrictive, Bitcoin could face sustained pressure.

From a portfolio perspective, Bitcoin often behaves like a high-risk asset during market stress, undermining its narrative as a reliable hedge.

The Bull Case Still Has Defenders

Supporters counter that Bitcoin’s fixed supply, growing institutional adoption, and expanding infrastructure reduce the likelihood of an extreme collapse. They argue that each market cycle has strengthened the network and broadened its investor base.

However, even bullish analysts concede that volatility is inherent to the asset class and that steep corrections remain a defining feature of Bitcoin’s history.

Risk Management Takes Center Stage

For investors, the warning underscores the importance of disciplined risk management. Exposure sizing, diversification, and realistic expectations are critical when dealing with assets prone to large price swings.

Financial advisers increasingly stress that Bitcoin should be treated as a speculative allocation rather than a core holding, particularly for retail investors with limited risk tolerance.

A Market at a Crossroads

The prospect of an 80 percent decline may sound extreme, but history suggests it cannot be dismissed outright. Bitcoin stands at a crossroads between maturation and repetition of past cycles.

Whether the analyst’s forecast proves accurate or overly pessimistic will depend on liquidity conditions, macroeconomic trends, and investor behavior. What remains certain is that Bitcoin’s path forward will continue to test conviction on both sides of the market.

Bitcoin briefly crossed a critical price threshold before reversing course, sliding toward its weakest levels of the year as selling pressure intensified. The world’s largest cryptocurrency moved past the Rs. 71 lakh mark before failing to sustain momentum, underscoring fragile market confidence despite intermittent rallies. Traders cited fading liquidity, profit-taking, and broader risk aversion as key factors behind the downturn. The move highlights a market caught between long-term adoption narratives and short-term macroeconomic headwinds. As volatility resurfaces, investors are reassessing exposure, signaling a cautious phase for digital assets after months of uneven price action.

A Breakout That Failed to Hold

Bitcoin’s move above Rs. 71 lakh initially appeared to signal renewed strength. However, the rally quickly lost traction as sellers reasserted control. The inability to consolidate gains above that level triggered fresh downside momentum, pushing prices back toward yearly lows.

Market technicians noted that the breakout lacked follow-through buying, a sign that conviction remains limited. Without sustained inflows, short-lived advances are increasingly vulnerable to sharp reversals.

Liquidity and Profit-Taking Drive the Slide

Liquidity conditions played a central role in the retreat. Trading volumes thinned as prices rose, making the market susceptible to abrupt swings. Once selling began, stop-loss orders and short-term profit-taking accelerated the decline.

From a trading perspective, this behavior reflects a market dominated by tactical positioning rather than long-term accumulation. Participants appear quick to reduce exposure at the first sign of weakness.

Macro Pressures Weigh on Risk Assets

Bitcoin’s downturn mirrors broader caution across global markets. Higher interest rate expectations and tighter financial conditions have reduced appetite for speculative assets. In such environments, cryptocurrencies often struggle to attract fresh capital.

Institutional investors, in particular, remain sensitive to macro signals, treating Bitcoin as a high-volatility risk asset rather than a defensive hedge. This dynamic has limited upside while amplifying downside moves.

Technical Signals Point to Fragility

Chart indicators suggest Bitcoin remains in a vulnerable zone. Repeated failures to establish higher highs have reinforced resistance levels, while support near recent lows is being tested.

Analysts warn that a decisive break below current support could invite further selling, potentially extending losses. Conversely, stabilization would require renewed demand and a clear improvement in market sentiment.

Long-Term Narrative Meets Short-Term Reality

Despite near-term weakness, long-term supporters argue that Bitcoin’s structural case remains intact, citing fixed supply and growing integration into financial infrastructure. However, history shows that these narratives do not prevent deep interim drawdowns.

For investors, the disconnect between long-term optimism and short-term price action underscores the importance of time horizon and risk tolerance.

A Market Searching for Direction

Bitcoin’s failure to hold above Rs. 71 lakh reflects a market searching for direction amid competing forces. Bulls point to adoption and scarcity, while bears emphasize liquidity stress and macro uncertainty.

Until one narrative clearly dominates, price action is likely to remain volatile. For now, the drift toward annual lows serves as a reminder that even flagship digital assets are not immune to sharp reversals when confidence falters.

As digital asset markets mature, investors are increasingly weighing long-term fundamentals rather than short-term price momentum. A growing debate centers on whether Ethereum or XRP represents the stronger investment opportunity heading into 2026. Ethereum continues to dominate decentralized finance and smart contract infrastructure, while XRP is positioning itself as a high-efficiency settlement layer for global payments. Each asset offers a distinct value proposition, shaped by different adoption paths, risk profiles, and revenue drivers. The decision between the two ultimately reflects investor priorities—whether favoring programmable finance ecosystems or utility-driven payment networks in an evolving regulatory and macroeconomic environment.

Ethereum’s Case: Infrastructure for Digital Finance

Ethereum remains the backbone of decentralized applications, hosting the majority of decentralized finance protocols, tokenized assets, and blockchain-based financial services. Its transition toward a more scalable and energy-efficient network has strengthened its appeal to institutional participants.

From an economic standpoint, Ethereum benefits from network effects. As usage grows, transaction fees and staking dynamics play a central role in value capture. For investors, Ethereum resembles a digital infrastructure asset, tied to the expansion of on-chain activity rather than a single use case.

XRP’s Case: A Payments-Focused Utility Asset

XRP presents a contrasting investment thesis centered on cross-border payments and liquidity management. Designed for speed and low transaction costs, XRP aims to address inefficiencies in legacy payment systems.

Supporters argue that XRP’s utility-driven model makes it easier to assess in traditional financial terms. As global payment volumes migrate toward faster settlement, assets optimized for real-time transfers may see increased demand. Regulatory clarity has also improved visibility around XRP’s long-term viability in institutional settings.

Risk Profiles and Market Sensitivity

Ethereum’s broad ecosystem exposure brings both opportunity and complexity. While diversification across applications reduces reliance on a single sector, it also exposes Ethereum to regulatory scrutiny across multiple financial activities.

XRP, by contrast, faces concentration risk tied to adoption within the payments sector. However, this focus can also provide stability, as demand is linked to transaction efficiency rather than speculative activity alone.

Valuation and Growth Considerations

Ethereum’s valuation reflects its dominant position in programmable finance, but that dominance also means future growth must come from scaling and deeper institutional adoption. Marginal gains may be harder to achieve as the ecosystem matures.

XRP’s growth potential may be more asymmetric. Wider adoption in cross-border settlements could materially impact demand, particularly if financial institutions accelerate modernization efforts.

Regulatory and Institutional Outlook

Regulation will be a decisive factor for both assets. Ethereum’s classification as infrastructure rather than a financial instrument has supported institutional comfort. XRP’s improving regulatory visibility has reduced a major historical overhang.

For long-term investors, regulatory alignment offers more than compliance—it enables predictable capital allocation and risk modeling.

Choosing Between Two Distinct Strategies

The choice between Ethereum and XRP is less about superiority and more about strategic alignment. Ethereum appeals to investors seeking exposure to decentralized financial ecosystems and innovation-driven growth. XRP suits those prioritizing efficiency, payments infrastructure, and enterprise adoption.

Heading into 2026, both assets occupy important but distinct roles in the digital economy. A balanced portfolio may even accommodate both, reflecting the reality that blockchain’s future is unlikely to be defined by a single use case.

ICICI Prudential AMC IPO Oversubscribed 39 Times, Signals Strong Investor Appetite Gurjot Singh Wed, 17 Dec 2025 - 17:52

Indian Rupee Hits Record Low of ₹90.7 Against US Dollar Amid External Pressures Tushar Sharma Wed, 17 Dec 2025 - 17:37

Pakistan Central Bank Cuts Policy Rate to 10.5% Amid Economic Stabilization Efforts Binnypriya Singh Wed, 17 Dec 2025 - 17:35

Star Air Expands Operations with New Flights from Navi Mumbai Airport Gurjot Singh Wed, 17 Dec 2025 - 17:34